I feel that I’m quite adept with technology and both surveys supported my belief. In the Technology Applications Inventory that assesses ones knowledge and skills in the four strands of Foundations, Information Acquisition, Solving Problems, and Communication, of the 58 total questions, I only answered “no” to 9 of them. This data shows that I am 85% efficient in terms of the TEA’s technology knowledge and skills. It wasn’t until the last 2 strands, Solving Problems and Communication, that I indicated “no.” Of the things I’m lacking, most are in the communication strand involving publishing, telecommunications, and managerial design issues. To me, this inventory identifies areas to work into my internship plan.
To me the SETDA Teacher Survey was less helpful in my self-assessment. It seemed too convoluted in terms for given me clear feedback, but was very helpful in make me more aware of the many technology issues involved in education. Early in the survey the questions involved data to determine if students are being impacted by technology. I know my campus is utilizing more technology in its teaching, but we haven’t done much to measure the impact. This makes a point to be sure to not just use technology for technologies sake. Its implementation must be beneficial. This survey also stressed the importance that campus leadership collecting data referencing the use and effectiveness of technology. As with the first survey, this one also indicated my area for technology growth involves multimedia editing and authoring tools.
I think the take-home message from these 2 activities is that while I may have knowledge and skills with technology, it is important that I, as a campus leader, must ensure that the campus classroom teachers also have similar knowledge and skills so that they can promote those same abilities in the students.